|
Sharplin v Henderson () 2 NZLR 134 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a breach of a contract must be "substantial" for a contract to be cancelled. ==Background== Sharplin purchased a Tauranga orchard from Henderson. After the sale, it was discovered that the real estate agent had misrepresented that 900 trees belonged to the property, representing 25% of the property. Sharplin sued for misrepresentation. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Sharplin v Henderson」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|